Supported by the Greens Rohan Leppert and Cathy Oak the proposed development plans will transform the inner Melbourne Kensington suburb with minimal provisions for community open space or amenity.
Unlike soviet high rise developments the Melbourne planning scheme will allow for closer overshadowing developments creating a canyon of tall apartment buildings
To add to the folly of the City Council's development plans the City of Melbourne rejected the proposal to consider an overlay that would allow the Council to collect contributions from developers who fail to provide the requisite car parking provisions, forgoing a potential $400 million in loss revenue to pay for infrastructure and open space not provided by developers. Costs that will have to be born by future generations and ratepayers.
By forsaking the opportunity to impose a Parking Contributions overlay the City of Melbourne has removed from its arsenal significant financial incentives to encourage good design outcomes for Melbourne. A developer could be exempt from paying the Parking financial contribution if it could be demonstrated that the proposed development has an overwhelming community benefit. Likewise it could apply the imposition of the Parking levy to discourage inappropriate poor outcome developments.
Instead of considering this option as part of the Planning Scheme Amendment C208 Development Contributions Plan (which covers the Arden- Macaulay, City North and Southbank precincts). Our Melbourne City Councillors sat dumbfounded and remained silent. These contributions can only be recouped at the development stage and if the mechanism and schedule is not in place then the Council and the community misses out.
Future generations will pay for the mistakes and oversights of our ideologically driven Green Councillors
Melbourne Planning Scheme
45.09 PARKING OVERLAY
45.09-6 Financial contribution requirement
A schedule to this overlay may allow a responsible authority to collect a financial
contribution in accordance with the schedule as a way of meeting the car parking
requirements that apply under this overlay or Clause 52.06.
A schedule must specify:
The area to which the provisions allowing the collection of financial contributions
The amount of the contribution that may be collected in lieu of each car parking space
that is not provided, including any indexation of that amount.
When any contribution must be paid.
The purposes for which the responsible authority must use the funds collected under theschedule. Such purposes must be consistent with the objectives in section 4 of the Ac